Trauma Resiliency Model (TRM)® Level 1 Training Evaluation | May 13-15, 2022

Objectives

Instruction:

Faculty

Content and Credibility:

Teaching Methods:

Commitment to Change:

Name*

First Last

Please indicate the certificate that is most appropriate for you*.*

American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)
American Psychological Association (APA)
Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Approved Continuing Education (ACE)
Attendance Certificate

*If you do not know, please contact your licensing board for guidance.

How long did it take you to complete this activity?

Hours*

HH:MM

Name as it should appear on certificate*

Email*

The course met the stated objectives of the Trauma Resiliency Model (TRM)®Level 1 Training:

Identify three or more key concepts of the TRM.*

Explain three or more ways traumatic experiences affect the mind and body based on current scientific research.*

Explain the nine skills of the Trauma Resiliency Model.*

Describe the parasympathetic and sympathetic arms of the autonomic nervous system including the impact on traumatic stress symptoms.*

Describe how to assess Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder based upon the DSM V criteria*

Define historical, cumulative and intergenerational trauma.*

Explain the concept of “intersectionality” and its application to clinical practice.*

Describe the Adverse Childhood Experiences hallmark research and its application to TRM*

Describe the research about Positive Childhood Experiences and their influence on Adverse Childhood Experiences.*

Participants will engage in practice sessions demonstrating the use of the nine skills.*

Describe the first six skills of the TRM, also known as the Community Resiliency Model (CRM) ®*

Identify three or more ways to integrate TRM skills into clinical practice.*

List two or more ethical considerations with regard to implementing TRM*

The offering presented information clearly and logically.*

The learning format and length was suitable to the content.*

Questions were answered clearly.*

Rate the quality of the faculty member(s) listed below, from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor)taking into consideration their content, clinical relevance, teaching strategies, and level of expertise.

Mike Sapp, PhD*

Nobuko Hattori*

Will you change the way you practice based on this activity?*

Yes
No

Do you feel the activity was balanced and objective?*

Yes
No

Do you feel the activity was free of commercial bias?*

Yes
No

The course represented current best practice information.*

Approximately what percent of this content was NEW to you?*

What I liked about this activity…? (Select all that apply)*

It increased my knowledge
It will improve my communication with the healthcare team
It provided information in ways that I can review again later
It gave me the opportunity to apply information to realistic scenarios that I confront in my practice
It facilitated applying values/ethics to interprofessional practice

Training aids (study guide, slides, pocket cards, learning portal) were useful to clarify content.

The diversity of learning methods was appropriate for the subject matter and accommodating to various learning styles

Clinical Relevance

Teaching Strategies

Level of Expertise

As a result of my participation in this activity, I will commit to:

What was the most useful information you gained from this activity?

Future course topic recommendations: