CME Outfitters Peer Review – Activity Planning

CME Outfitters Activity Planning Survey

"*" indicates required fields

CONTINUING EDUCATION ACTIVITY PLANNING REVIEW FORM

Clinical Content Evaluation and Validation

Instructions to Peer Reviewer: Please review the syllabus/course guide for the educational activity provided. As an independent reviewer for CME Outfitters, your role is to validate content, ensure the materials are fair, balanced, and free of commercial bias, and estimate applicability to the target audience. We ask that you scrutinize patient treatment recommendations to ensure they represent standard practice guidelines in the United States and conform to research principles generally accepted by the scientific community. The content or format of a CE activity or its related materials must promote improvements or quality in healthcare and not a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Presentations must give a balanced view of therapeutic options. Use of generic names will contribute to this impartiality. If the CE educational material or content includes trade names, where available trade names from several companies should be used, not just trade names from a single company. We appreciate your candid feedback and thank you for contributing to high-quality CME/CE.

1. Review for Fair Balance and Bias

1.Are the activity's learning objectives actionable and measurable?
2. Do the planning materials appropriately address the stated learning objectives?
3. Is the planned content outline clinically relevant, accurate, and based on valid evidence (based on materials provided)?
4. Are you aware of any new scientific developments that could require a change to the current planning materials?
5. Do the planning materials include content relevant and consistent with all scopes of practice of the identified health care professions in the target audience?
6. Do planning materials address educational needs of the health care team or as members of the health care team (eg, knowledge, attitudes, practice changes, skills, strategies, and/or improved communication)?

2. Bias

1. Are planning materials free from commercial bias and not promoting a particular or proprietary interest?
2. Is it apparent from the content of the planning materials what company supported the activity?
3. Is there any aspect of the planning materials that suggest an addition or removal of components to improve fair balance or mitigate any commercial bias?

6. General

A. Are there any other issues you would like to raise with regard to the planning and/or content of this activity?

You can print this page for your records. To print, select print from the menu in your web browser.

By clicking the Submit button below, you attest to understanding your role and responsibility as a peer reviewer, and providing candid feedback in accordance with the following paragraph:

As an independent reviewer for CME Outfitters, your role is to validate content, ensure the materials are fair, balanced, and free of commercial bias, and applicability to the target audience. We ask that you scrutinize patient treatment recommendations to ensure they represent standard practice guidelines in the United States and conform to research principles generally accepted by the scientific community. The content or format of a CME activity or its related materials must promote improvements or quality in healthcare and not a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Presentations must give a balanced view of therapeutic options. Use of generic names will contribute to this impartiality. If the CME educational material or content includes trade names, where available trade names from several companies should be used, not just trade names from a single company.

By clicking this button, I am affixing my signature to this document.